Comparison
Gmap Data vs HasData: Pricing, Features & Use Cases
Observed 10 October 2026 from public vendor pages. Prices and features change; re-check HasData before buying.
HasData — A developer-friendly scraping API with Google Maps search, place and reviews endpoints plus no-code scrapers. Each side is stated fairly below, including where Gmap Data is the more expensive choice.
New accounts are invite-only while we onboard early customers.
The short answer
Short answer: HasData is a clean, well-priced API for pulling Maps search pages (around 20 places per request) with a free tier and paid plans from $59/month. Gmap Data is a finished lead workflow where you pay per saved, deduplicated business. If you want to fetch Maps JSON into your own system, HasData is cheaper and simpler; if you want a reviewed list with contact evidence, Gmap Data is the product.
Side by side
Swipe the table sideways to see every column.
| Dimension | HasData | Gmap Data |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Scraping API with 40+ endpoints and 30 no-code scrapers | Managed Google Maps business-list workflow |
| Pricing unit | Successful API request (one Maps search returns about 20 places) | Saved business (1 credit = 1 saved row) |
| Entry price | Free tier; paid plans from $59/month for 40,000 requests | Free 10 credits/month; Lite $49/month (500 saved) |
| Unit price (observed) | $1.23 per 1,000 Maps Search requests at the entry paid tier on the pricing page, falling to $0.35 at high volume (the API page markets $1.48 to $0.42) | 1 credit per saved business ($98 per 1,000 across two Lite months, credits carry over) |
| What you get | Structured JSON: search results, place details, reviews, photos, posts | Saved list rows with normalized fields, dedup and CSV export |
| Deduplication | None across your requests; you own the merge | Google place-id dedup before saving |
| Contact evidence | Not offered; the APIs return maps content | Source, quality class and verification status per discovered email |
| Failed requests | Not billed | Searches, duplicates and failures never consume credits |
| Developer surfaces | REST API, CLI, MCP server, no-code scrapers | No public API |
| Target user | Developers and AI pipelines | Operators who want the list and the workflow |
HasData figures observed from hasdata.com/prices and the Google Maps Search API page on 10 October 2026. The two pages quote different entry unit prices ($1.23 vs $1.48 per 1,000 requests); both are stated because both were observed. Gmap Data figures are its live catalogue on the same date.
Where HasData is the better fit
- A free tier and a $59/month entry make evaluation and small projects cheap.
- Developer experience is a focus: REST API, CLI, MCP server and no-code scrapers for the same endpoints.
- One search returns a full page of places with fast median response times (the vendor publishes ~1.2s P50 on the Maps Search endpoint).
- Only successful requests are billed.
What to weigh up with HasData
- The unit is a request returning roughly 20 places, so the effective cost per retained business is the request price divided by however many you keep.
- No deduplication across requests and no saved list; merging is yours.
- No email discovery or verification evidence.
- No review or outreach workflow; it is an API, not an application.
Where Gmap Data is the better fit
- The unit is the outcome: 1 credit per business saved, with duplicates and failures free.
- Place-id deduplication means overlapping city searches do not double-charge.
- Contact evidence per discovered email, with undeliverable contacts excluded from outreach-ready state.
- A review workspace (projects, completeness, suppression) and CSV export.
Where Gmap Data loses
- Roughly 66x-280x more expensive per 1,000 businesses than HasData's observed entry unit prices, depending on volume tier.
- No API, CLI, MCP server or no-code scraper library.
- No reviews, photos or posts endpoints.
When HasData is the right choice
- Developers embedding Maps data in their own product or AI pipeline.
- Small projects that fit the free tier or the $59/month entry plan.
- Teams that want raw maps JSON (search, reviews, photos) and will build the workflow.
When Gmap Data is the right choice
- Operators who want a deduplicated lead list with contact evidence without building anything.
- Buyers who value outcome-based billing over request-based billing.
- Country campaigns in Malaysia, Indonesia and Vietnam.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Is HasData cheaper than Gmap Data?
Per request, yes: observed unit prices start around $1.23 per 1,000 Maps Search requests ($1.48 on the API page) and fall with volume. Because a request returns roughly 20 places and there is no deduplication, the cost per business you keep depends on your own filtering. Gmap Data charges $49/month for 500 saved, deduplicated businesses.
Does HasData find emails?
The observed Maps endpoints return maps content (places, reviews, photos). Email discovery and verification evidence are not part of them; Gmap Data includes published-email discovery and records the evidence.
Can I use HasData without coding?
HasData offers no-code scrapers, but it remains an API-first product. Gmap Data is a full application with no API at all; pick by which direction you want.
Which tool deduplicates repeated searches?
Gmap Data deduplicates by Google place id before saving. With HasData, deduplication across requests is yours to build.
How current is this comparison?
HasData figures were observed from its public pricing and API pages on 10 October 2026, and both observed unit prices are quoted. Re-check the vendor before purchasing.
Keep exploring
Related pages
Start with an invited account
Request access and we will help you size the first searches for your market.