Comparison

Gmap Data vs Octoparse: Pricing, Features & Use Cases

Observed 10 October 2026 from public vendor pages. Prices and features change; re-check Octoparse before buying.

Octoparse — A general-purpose no-code web-scraping platform; Google Maps extraction means building and maintaining a template. Each side is stated fairly below, including where Gmap Data is the more expensive choice.

New accounts are invite-only while we onboard early customers.

The short answer

Short answer: Octoparse is not a Google Maps lead product; it is a general no-code scraper that can be pointed at Google Maps with a custom template you build and maintain. Gmap Data is the narrower, finished product: a managed Maps list with deduplication, contact evidence and CSV export. If you need to scrape many different websites, Octoparse is the better tool; if you need a Maps lead list, it is the harder route.

Side by side

Swipe the table sideways to see every column.

DimensionOctoparseGmap Data
What it isGeneral no-code scraping platform for any websitePurpose-built Google Maps business-list workflow
Pricing unitPlan (tasks, cloud runs, export volume) - not per Maps recordSaved business (1 credit = 1 saved row)
Free planFree forever: 10 tasks, local extraction only, up to 50,000 rows/month, 10,000 rows per exportFree plan: 10 credits/month
Entry paid priceStandard from $69/month billed annually ($83 monthly)Lite $49/month
Google Maps supportVia a template you build and maintain against the Maps UI; not a Maps data productFirst-class: city searches, country campaigns, place-id dedup
DeduplicationNot built in for Maps; you own the data pipelineGoogle place-id dedup before saving
Contact evidenceNot applicable; you scrape whatever the page showsSource, quality class and verification status per discovered email
Anti-blockingIP rotation, residential proxies and CAPTCHA solving on paid plansNot applicable; data comes from Google's official Places APIs
ExportsExcel / CSV / JSON / HTML / XML; Sheets/Drive/Dropbox/S3 on ProfessionalCSV with a stable append-only column contract
Cloud schedulingYes, on paid plans (3 concurrent cloud runs on Standard)Yes; the product runs the search for you
Review workflowNone; output is a datasetProjects, completeness metrics, suppression handling, credit ledger

Octoparse figures observed from octoparse.com/pricing on 10 October 2026 (annual and monthly columns). Gmap Data figures are its live catalogue on the same date. Prices and plan limits change; re-check the vendor.

Where Octoparse is the better fit

  • It scrapes anything, not just Maps: one tool for many data sources.
  • A real free plan (10 tasks, 50,000 rows/month) to evaluate without a card.
  • Cloud scheduling and anti-blocking (proxies, CAPTCHA solving) are included from the Standard tier.
  • Direct exports to databases and cloud storage on higher tiers.

What to weigh up with Octoparse

  • Maps extraction is a template you build and maintain; every Maps UI change is your maintenance problem.
  • There is no Maps data model: no place-id deduplication, no contact evidence, no country campaign planner.
  • The free plan is local-only; cloud extraction and scheduling require the paid tier.
  • Pricing is plan-based, not outcome-based, so cost per usable lead depends on how well your template works.

Where Gmap Data is the better fit

  • A finished Maps workflow: search, dedup, review and export with no template to maintain.
  • 1 credit per saved business; searches, duplicates and failures are free.
  • Contact evidence and completeness metrics come with the list.
  • Country campaigns for Malaysia, Indonesia and Vietnam with a bounded credit cost before you start.

Where Gmap Data loses

  • $49/month buys 500 saved businesses; Octoparse's Standard plan exports unlimited rows for $69/month billed annually, so heavy-volume scrapers get more raw data per dollar.
  • It only works with Google Maps data; it cannot scrape other websites at all.
  • No anti-blocking layer - but it does not need one, because it uses official APIs.

When Octoparse is the right choice

  • Teams whose scraping needs go beyond Maps (directories, marketplaces, competitor sites).
  • Operators who want to own the scraping template and the schedule.
  • Projects that need unlimited export volume at a flat monthly price.

When Gmap Data is the right choice

  • Teams that want a Maps lead list without building or maintaining a scraper.
  • Buyers who specifically need place-id deduplication and contact evidence.
  • Country-scale Maps campaigns with predictable credit spend.

Questions

Frequently asked questions

Can Octoparse scrape Google Maps?

Yes, by building a scraping template against the Maps interface. It is not a Maps data product: fields, de-duplication and contact evidence are not built in, and template maintenance is yours. Gmap Data is purpose-built for Maps lists.

Is Octoparse cheaper than Gmap Data?

For unlimited export volume, Octoparse's Standard plan at $69/month billed annually is cheaper than buying equivalent Gmap Data credits. Gmap Data's $49/month Lite plan covers 500 saved businesses; above that volume Octoparse wins on price per raw row.

Does Gmap Data scrape other websites?

No. Gmap Data extracts Google Maps business data and can scan business websites for published contact emails. It cannot scrape arbitrary sites the way Octoparse can.

Which tool suits a non-technical operator?

Both are no-code, but Gmap Data has no template to build: you enter a query and a location and the product runs the search. Octoparse requires designing a workflow first.

How current is this comparison?

Octoparse figures were observed from its public pricing page on 10 October 2026. Re-check the vendor before purchasing.

Keep exploring

Related pages

Start with an invited account

Request access and we will help you size the first searches for your market.