Comparison
Gmap Data vs G Maps Extractor: an honest, dated comparison
Observed 8 October 2026. Prices and features change; re-check both vendors before buying.
G Maps Extractor and Gmap Data both build business lists from Google Maps, but one prices records and the other prices saved businesses. This page compares them from dated public observations and names the cases where G Maps Extractor is the stronger choice.
No rankings, review counts or performance scores are claimed for either product.
New accounts are invite-only while we onboard early customers.
A records-based tool next to a saved-business tool
G Maps Extractor (gmapsextractor.com) sells records: monthly subscriptions that include a set number of extracted business records, with separate plans for its online scraper, browser extension and API. Gmap Data sells saved businesses, with free searches and deduplication before a credit is ever consumed.
Both approaches are legitimate. Records-based pricing is easy to forecast if you already know your volume; saved-business pricing only charges for rows you keep. The table below is built from public pages observed on the same day.
| G Maps Extractor | Gmap Data | |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | $0: 1,000 records/month, up to 2 keywords per task | 10 credits/month (Free plan) |
| Entry paid price | Lite $19/month (list $29), 20,000 records | Starter $149/month, 1,000 saved businesses |
| Mid tiers | Basic $49 (list $59) 80,000 records; Growth $99 (list $119) 250,000 records | Growth $699 / 5,000; Pro $2,699 / 20,000; Scale $6,499 / 50,000 |
| Products | Online scraper, browser extension and API are separate subscriptions | One managed web app; no extension or public API |
| Exports | CSV / Excel / JSON | CSV (stable, append-only column contract) |
| Emails & socials | Listed as fields on their plans | Published-email discovery with source and quality; BYOK enrichment and verification |
| Multi-keyword tasks | Up to 20 keywords per task on higher tiers | One query per run; saved searches and recurring campaigns |
| Developer surface | API plans and an MCP server page for AI clients | No public API or MCP server |
| Languages | Site and product documentation in 5 languages | English (this phase) |
| Country-scale search | Keyword and location based | Whole-country campaigns for Malaysia, Indonesia and Vietnam |
| Contact evidence | Fields listed per plan | Deliverability status, verification result and suppression handling per contact |
Competitor column observed from public pages on 8 October 2026; their plans and prices change. Gmap Data facts from its live catalogue and product behaviour on the same date.
Where G Maps Extractor is the better fit
- Cost per record: at the observed Lite tier ($19 for 20,000 records) the effective price is under a tenth of a cent per record, far below Gmap Data's per-business price.
- A free tier that is generous for testing: 1,000 records per month at no cost.
- You want an extension, an API or an MCP server: they publish all three; Gmap Data publishes none.
- Multi-keyword tasks and multi-language documentation suit international teams.
- Separate subscriptions let a team buy only the surface it uses (for example, extension only).
Where Gmap Data is the better fit
- You want to pay for outcomes, not attempts: searches, duplicates and failed lookups never consume credits, and deduplication by place id happens before saving.
- You want contact evidence rather than a field list: discovered emails carry their source and quality class, verification results are recorded per address, and undeliverable contacts are excluded from outreach-ready state.
- You prefer bring-your-own-key providers: enrichment and verification run on accounts you already pay for and never consume platform credits.
- You need an account-scoped review workspace: projects, suppression handling, data-completeness metrics and an append-only credit ledger.
- You want whole-country coverage with a boundary rule that skips results from a different structured country at zero customer credits.
The price gap, stated plainly
On 8 October 2026, G Maps Extractor's Lite plan was $19/month (list $29) for 20,000 records, while Gmap Data's Starter plan was $149/month for 1,000 saved businesses. That is about $0.95 per 1,000 records - roughly 157x less than Gmap Data's Starter price per 1,000 saved businesses.
That is a real advantage, and Gmap Data does not claim otherwise. The difference is what the unit includes: Gmap Data charges only for saved rows and bundles deduplication, contact evidence, provider-key isolation and an auditable ledger. Buyers whose priority is the lowest cost per record should treat G Maps Extractor as a serious candidate.
How to decide between them
Estimate your monthly record volume
If it is high and stable, a records subscription is easy to budget. If it varies with how many unique businesses exist, per-saved-business pricing avoids paying for attempts.
Decide if you need an API or extension
If yes, G Maps Extractor already ships them. If no, a managed app removes a surface you would not maintain.
Compare contact evidence
Field lists look similar; the difference is whether you get provenance, verification status and suppression handling for each contact.
Test on one market
Run the same query and area, then compare deduplication, missing fields and contact quality in the exported files.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Is Gmap Data cheaper than G Maps Extractor?
No. On 8 October 2026 G Maps Extractor's Lite plan was $19/month for 20,000 records and Gmap Data's Starter was $149/month for 1,000 saved businesses. G Maps Extractor is far cheaper per record; Gmap Data only charges for saved rows and includes contact evidence and a review workspace.
Does Gmap Data have an extension, API or MCP server?
No. G Maps Extractor publishes all three; Gmap Data is a managed web app without a public API or extension.
What does 'record' mean versus 'saved business'?
A record is a business returned by an extraction run under their plans. A saved business is a deduplicated row stored in your Gmap Data workspace, and only those consume credits.
Which one should an agency choose?
It depends on the workflow. Volume-heavy extraction with API needs points to G Maps Extractor on observed pricing; teams that need contact evidence, verification and project review may prefer Gmap Data despite the higher unit price.
Are the competitor figures on this page verified?
They are quoted from public vendor pages observed on 8 October 2026 and dated for that reason. They are not independently audited, and they change.
Keep exploring
Related pages
Gmap Data vs GMapsScraper
The search-credit model compared, with the same honesty rules.
Google Maps scraper pricing compared
The three pricing units and dated observed prices.
Business email finder
Discovery provenance, enrichment and verification evidence.
Lead cost calculator
Estimate the cost of a list on Gmap Data's plans.
Start with an invited account
Request access and we will help you size the first searches for your market.